princesslori
princesslori princesslori
  • 18-09-2016
  • History
contestada

Why must historians always be skeptical when they read primary sources documents?

Respuesta :

shadowfall
shadowfall shadowfall
  • 18-09-2016
Because they could be biased and strongly opinionated and also the primary source does not have the benefit of hindsight and is therefore not a valid interpretation and less credible
Answer Link

Otras preguntas

What tradition did the Bantu people bring with them throughout their migrations? farming hunting and gathering trading craftsmanship..
The process of "digestion" in a cell is aided by the _____. A. cytoplasm B. nucleus C. lysosome D. mitochondria
What did Acrisius do to try to keep the prophecy of his death from being fulfilled? He set his daughter and her child adrift at sea in a sealed chest. He banish
How do you work out 3/5 of 65?
what is the downfall of the hero in a tragedy?
How much money do Hansel and Gretel`s parents have?
Why did many Americans believe imperialism was wrong?A. BECAUSE IT DESTROYED NATIVE CULTURES.B. BECAUSE IT CREATED MONOPOLIES.C.BECAUSE EUROPEAN COUNTRIES HAD C
HELP PLEASE !!! Aneesha used linear combination to solve the system of equations shown. She did so by multiplying the first equation by 5 and the second equatio
-x2 + x-1=0 find the discriminant of each quadratic equation then state the number and type of solution
The source of state power specifically outlined in A.the tenth amendment B.the supremacy clause C.article l. D.state constitution.